Ghost Recon - Official Subreddit

Ghost Recon: Breakpoint 80% Off

2026-02-26T19:25:56+00:00

submitted by /u/JJ-GAMESTER
[link] [comments]

Low effort "Concept art" posts

2025-07-10T22:47:52+00:00

Hello fellow Ghosts,

It seems to be a recent trend on some gaming subreddits that some accounts that may or may not bot accounts keep posting concept arts of games that have been released for years to farm some easy karma. To be clear, these are considered low effort and will be removed if we spot them. If you have any questions regarding this topic, feel free to ask.

submitted by /u/JohnnyTest91
[link] [comments]

Holographic sight with a digital thermal imaging sensor

2026-06-09T18:33:29+00:00

What do you guys think about Ubisoft including new developments in thermal sighting and imaging in the next game? Personally I think it’d be a great addition.

submitted by /u/CrassiusCurio117
[link] [comments]

My attempt at German and American uniforms

2026-06-10T02:03:56+00:00

Military

submitted by /u/Sashesvoid
[link] [comments]

Ghost Recon with mods is on another level, I love the cosmetics. <3

2026-06-09T19:45:37+00:00

submitted by /u/True_Gate121
[link] [comments]

Some pictures i took on breakpoint

2026-06-09T15:44:40+00:00

A set of pictures i took ingame

submitted by /u/Imaginary-Suit-3640
[link] [comments]

enemies and the lack of NVGs

2026-06-09T16:06:17+00:00

I've always wondered why enemies like Sentinel Wolves and Bodarks don't have night vision. It's really strange that they have all this futuristic military equipment but not something as simple as night vision goggles. I mean, it could make the game more challenging. A clear example was Splinter Cell Blacklist with the Quds. I wish there was a mod that allowed this.

submitted by /u/True_Gate121
[link] [comments]

CrossCom VR: The Ghost Selection Program

2026-06-09T20:10:16+00:00

My idea for A GR Extraction gamemode, hear me out...

Before anyone reaches for the downvote button, no, I don't think every shooter needs an extraction mode. That said, I do think one could fit GR if it was built around something unique to the franchise instead of just copying Tarkov or Arena Breakput.

Imagine a completely separate mode built around next gen CrossCom VR tech. Tier 1 personnel from across the military are invited to what looks like a routine training exercise. Using advanced CrossCom systems, they're dropped into massive sandbox environments based on real world locations. The simulation is so realistic it feels like actual combat.

But one thing needs to be clear, these aren't Ghosts. Not yet anyway.

The participants think they're just there to train. What they don't realise is they're actually being evaluated for GST. The simulation isn't just training Special Forces personnel, it's identifying future Ghosts.

Teams of real players deploy into a large open sandbox filled with AI enemy forces, dynamic objectives, HVTs, intel targets and rival Tier 1 teams. No AI teammates. Every squad is made up of actual players taking part in the same exercise.

Drop in. Gather intel. Complete objectives. Secure sensitive data. Adapt to changing conditions. Extract before time runs out.

Preparation is just as important as execution. Weapons, armour, equipment and squad balance all matter. Carry too much gear and you'll slow yourself down. Carry too litlte and you might not survive multiple firefights. Vehicles can be found around the map but fuel is limited, so squads have to constantly balance mobility, firepower, endurance and extraction planning.

CrossCom tracks everything. Mission success, intel recovered, teamwork, combat effectiveness, squad wipes, successful extractions, the lot. Every decision is being scored. Every objective completed. Every teammate revived. Every extraction. Every failure.

As the exercise goes on, the system starts issuing updates across the battlefield.

"CROSSCOM UPDATE: TEAM DELTA CURRENTLY LEADS THE EXERCISE."

"CROSSCOM UPDATE: TEAM BRAVO HAS COMPLETED A PRIORITY OBJECTIVE."

"CROSSCOM UPDATE: BLACKOUT EVENT IMMINENT."

No locations are revealed. No one gets wallhacks. The updates are there purely to add pressure and competition between teams.

The longer the exercise goes on, the more dangerous the battlefield becomes. CrossCom starts ramping things up by deploying recon teams, helicopters, artillery and armoured units across the map. A quiet area can quickly become a hotspot, forcing squads to change plans or risk getting caught in a fight they weren't ready for.

The simulation itself could become part of the challenge. During blackout events, CrossCom systems partially fail. No advanced sensors. No drone feeds. Limited battlefield information. Success comes down to tactics, communication and teamwork rather than technology.

For the PvE side, the simulation could generate different enemy forces each match. One game you might be dealing with militia groups, the next insurgents, PMCs, terrorist cells or even a near-peer military force. The goal isn't just to survive. It's to prove you can adapt, lead and complete the mission under pressure.

Most importantly, Ubi would need to keep it grounded in the things that make Tom Clancy games work. Believable military objectives, prototype technology that feels plausible, intelligence gathering, squad coordination and tactical decision making. The focus shouldn't be on loot. It should be on extracting valuable intelligence, completing missions and proving your team can operate effectively in a contested environment.

What I like about this idea is that it keeps the Tom Clancy feel. It's not Ghosts randomly fighting Ghosts in the real world. It's elite military personnel unknowingly competing for a place in GST.

Not every shooter needs an extraction mode, but I think this could fit GR pretty well if it was done right.

Would you play something like this?

submitted by /u/MrTrippp
[link] [comments]

Burn His Operation to Find Him | Realistic Narrative-Driven Gameplay

2026-06-09T19:37:55+00:00

submitted by /u/juguLator01
[link] [comments]

Tier 1 Operator Tactical Awareness in Third Person (Ghost Recon Project Over)

2026-06-08T20:47:57+00:00

Full video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58nG88nGp80

My name is Eagleyezx and the reason why I play military video games in third person is I just find them fun and its a preference.

I'm aware I can peep around corners, over rocks, around objects but you know what? That's alright - its a video game. You guys should try that sometime.

Why do you guys make third person something that it isn't? I appreciate the passion for third person, but most of you guys are incredibly disingenuous.

Ghost Recon Project Over is envisioned for first person because its more challenging, immersive and realistic. That's all folks. Just skip the game. Everything is going to be okay.

If you're a true Ghost Recon fan, you'll buy the game irrespective. of the perspective.

Now I'm going to play some third person Ready or Not.

submitted by /u/Eagleyezx
[link] [comments]

Any news on ghost recon over?

2026-06-09T17:52:41+00:00

Anything new on project over

submitted by /u/TactiqueChevalier
[link] [comments]

Whilst continuing the ''Fallen Ghosts'' playthrough, there was this part where you interrogate an Extranjeros lieutenant, on a guy to rescue named Hansen. Just as I was about to order fire on the enemies, this beautiful Toucan appeared. I absolutely had to stop playing to capture these photos 😄

2026-06-08T20:51:42+00:00

submitted by /u/JS-CroftLover
[link] [comments]

Did not know they could shoot this far lol,

2026-06-08T10:41:01+00:00

I just started the game and was just admiring the view from on top of the mountain.

submitted by /u/No-Anywhere-5257
[link] [comments]

Better night vision

2026-06-08T12:57:44+00:00

I really hope Project Over has some better night vision. what improvements are yall the most hopeful for in the next game?

submitted by /u/47106103
[link] [comments]

Playing Ghost Recon Breakpoint How its Meant to Be Played: Spartan, Radio Mods, Increase Presence, Authentic Warfare

2026-06-09T17:01:18+00:00

submitted by /u/Eagleyezx
[link] [comments]

Some in-game photos i took in wildlands.

2026-06-08T17:13:44+00:00

submitted by /u/SameRange2321
[link] [comments]

Facta Non Verba

2026-06-08T19:44:50+00:00

submitted by /u/greaseyharbour
[link] [comments]

An Open Letter to Ubisoft: Reclaiming the Tom Clancy Legacy

2026-06-08T04:06:49+00:00

Let’s cut right to it. The Tom Clancy name used to mean something very specific. It wasn’t just a brand slapped on a box to boost sales; it was a promise. It meant terrifyingly plausible geopolitics. It meant looking at the evening news and realizing we were playing out tomorrow’s worst-case scenario.

That is exactly why Breakpoint failed so spectacularly.

You took a franchise rooted in gritty, tactical realism and turned it into a sterile, sci-fi theme park. Fighting autonomous drones on a fake tech-bro island completely shattered the immersion. A tier-one military operation shouldn't involve shooting rockets at bullet-sponge robots, and it definitely shouldn't involve worrying about whether our beanie has a higher "gear score" than our assault rifle.

Wildlands worked because the world had a pulse. The cartel, the civilians, the gritty reality of a narco-state—it had a tangible sense of danger.

As you continue development on "Project Over," hear the community on this: do not water down the stakes.

We understand the corporate need to avoid diplomatic incidents by fictionalizing the names of operations or countries (we all remember the Bolivia situation). But the friction, the borders, and the motivations must mirror reality. A fake war in a fake country fought over fake politics does not do Tom Clancy justice. Fortune favors the bold. Use real countries. Real problems.

Give us the Pentagon war game standard back. Give us lethal squad tactics, human combatants, and a world that feels dangerously authentic. Trust your audience enough to give us a real geopolitical thriller again.

TL;DR: The next Ghost Recon needs the grounded, ripped-from-the-headlines tactical realism that made the Tom Clancy Ghost Recon name legendary in the first place. Build off Wildlands. Not Breakpoint. Work off real world situations.

submitted by /u/Ready_Mongoose6883
[link] [comments]

Auroa Special Forces is looking for Operators 🤝

2026-06-08T22:55:29+00:00

submitted by /u/CaffeinatedPenguin0
[link] [comments]

Ghost Recon Extraction

2026-06-09T10:48:21+00:00

For my PVPVE Ghosts out there, what do you guys think about an Eacape from Tarkov style GR extraction mode where instead of BEAR and USEC, you have Bodark and Wolves.

submitted by /u/KillMonger592
[link] [comments]

Haven’t played in a while but damn this game still looks good

2026-06-08T05:00:20+00:00

submitted by /u/-NUMBZ-
[link] [comments]

We Playing Crossfire?

2026-06-07T21:53:48+00:00

It looks good ngl

submitted by /u/daMiadaZtouch
[link] [comments]

▢The game we all been waiting for.

2026-06-09T07:20:08+00:00

submitted by /u/Key_Weather_3061
[link] [comments]

A First Person Only Ghost Recon Could Be a Huge Mistake.

2026-06-06T22:21:06+00:00

First off, nothing has been officially confirmed by Ubi themselves and nothing says that Project Ovr is locked to a FP perspectiv. I don't think FP is automatically a bad thing, and im not writing it off. It can absolutely add immersion, tension, and realism. If Ubisoft wants a more grounded and authentic experience, I can understand why they'd explore that direction.

My concern is Ghost Recon potentially becoming first-person only.

One of GRs biggest strengths is that it occupies a space very few games do. The shooter market is absolutely flooded with first-person shooters. I understand the argument that console players don't really have a AAA tactical FPS right now, and that's a fair point. But the wider shooter market is still crowded with FPS games, and to the average casual player, Project Ovr could easily be seen as just another FPS game.

Ghost Recon has always stood apart from that crowd. It's one of the few major tactical military shooters that gives players a third-person perspective, squad-based gameplay, and deep customization all in one package. That's a big part of why many of us play it.

The recent Crossfire reveal has only reinforced this for me. The reception has been pretty positive so far and one of the biggest things people seem excited about is the third-person gameplay. The animations look smooth, the combat looks great, and it reminds me that there are still plenty of players who enjoy this style of shooter even if it isnt an actual "tactical shooter".

That's partly why I struggle with the idea of GR potentially going first-person only. One of the few big tactical military franchises still operating in the third-person space would be abandoning exactly what helps make it stand out.

Another concern is tactical awareness and squad control.

In third-person, it's much easier to maintain awareness of your surroundings, your squad, and the battlefield as a whole. Could Ubisoft make a first-person Ghost Recon work? Absolutely. But if they're going all-in on FP, I'd argue we'd need a much deeper command system, TacMap, or even something inspired by ATAK to help control our squad effectively. Otherwise, managing AI teammates could become more difficult than it needs to be.

Then there's customization.

Let's be honest, a huge portion of the modern GR community loves building their Ghost. Whether it's creating realistic military loadouts, recreating special operations units, or just making your own unique operator, customization has become a massive part of GR. If we're locked into first-person 99% of the time, what's the point? Why spend hours building a Ghost if you rarely get to see them?

This is one of the reasons we're all hoping Ubisoft would implement a perspective toggle.

I've mentioned before that I've wondered whether Ubisoft intentionally allowed some of the Project Ovr information to leak back in 2023 to gauge community reaction. If they did, they've almost certainly seen the concerns surrounding a first-person only GR. That's why I've always hoped the final game would include both perspectives.

A toggle seems like the best solution for everyone.

- Most importantly, the community stays together instead of being divided.

- First-person for players who want maximum immersion and realism.

- Third-person for players who enjoy greater situational awareness and squad management.

- Players get to actually see the Ghost they've spent time creating.

- Ubisoft appeals to a larger audience and gives players more ways to enjoy the game.

But what if Ubisoft really is pushing forward with a first-person only Ghost Recon?

Could it still be a good game? Absolutely.

The question for me is whether that's the right move for GR, especially when the next game probably needs to be a major success for Ubisoft.

For me, a perspective toggle remains the ideal solution. First-person for immersion and realism. Third-person for tactical awareness, squad management, and actually seeing the operator you've spent hours creating.

So I'm curious where everyone stands on this right now. If the next Ghost Recon launches as a first-person only game with no perspective toggle, would you still buy it?

Sorry for the length of this one guys. 😮‍💨

submitted by /u/MrTrippp
[link] [comments]

One of the super-soldiers in the new A24 movie "Onslaught" features a modified BP Wolf airsoft mask.

2026-06-07T06:55:35+00:00

I do in fact own the mask in real life; it's pretty sturdy so I can see why they chose it for the movie. I wonder if the guy in the Props department is a GR fan. If you are and you happen to be in this sub, I salute you bro, we caught the reference. 🫡

submitted by /u/Niceguygonefeminist
[link] [comments]