<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><updated>2026-06-10T05:01:45+00:00</updated><icon>https://www.redditstatic.com/icon.png/</icon><id>/r/Adguard/.rss</id><link rel="self" href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/.rss" type="application/atom+xml" /><link rel="alternate" href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/" type="text/html" /><subtitle>AdGuard is a company with over 15 years of experience in ad blocking and privacy protection mostly known for AdGuard ad blocker, AdGuard VPN, and AdGuard DNS. More than 150 million people have already chosen AdGuard.</subtitle><title>AdGuard: news and discussions</title><entry><author><name>/u/shwrellia</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/shwrellia</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Big milestones aren&amp;#39;t just about the flashy, headline-grabbing features. They&amp;#39;re also a great time to appreciate the unsung heroes — the tools that have been quietly doing the heavy lifting in the background all this time. Data privacy, encryption, and silent security mechanisms: today’s lineup is all about what’s happening under the hood. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://adguard-vpn.com/en/blog/adguard-vpn-protocol-goes-open-source-meet-trusttunnel.html?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TrustTunnel&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt; Let’s start with a tool our CTO runs every single day. TrustTunnel is our open-source client for custom connections. When a standard VPN just won&amp;#39;t cut it, when you don&amp;#39;t want to just pick a server from a dropdown, but want to map out your entire routing path yourself — TrustTunnel gives you total autonomy &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;I find myself using it almost more than a regular VPN,&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt; our CTO notes. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That’s no exaggeration, for anyone who deeply values online independence, this tool quickly becomes an essential part of their stack. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Connection Journal in&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://adguard-vpn.com/en/blog/adguard-vpn-protocol-goes-open-source-meet-trusttunnel.html?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TrustTunnel&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt; With ultimate freedom comes the need for total clarity: where is your traffic actually going? That&amp;#39;s where the Connection Journal comes in. Our Mobile Dev Team Lead explains: &amp;quot;This option is incredibly helpful for analyzing traffic destinations so you can quickly add specific IPs to your exclusions.&amp;quot; Essentially, it gives you an instant X-ray view of your connection &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://adguard-mail.com/welcome.html?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AdGuard Mail&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&amp;amp; Temp Mail integration&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt; While your traffic is being smartly routed below the surface, up on the web your personal email is likely a magnet for spam. Every one-off account registration or sketchy online checkout form feels like an open invitation for junk mail. To solve this, we created AdGuard Mail with Temp Mail integration. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Our CTO shares his go-to scenario: &lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;I love setting up email relays that point directly to my disposable temporary inbox.&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt; By routing the clutter through a temporary address, the junk never touches your primary mailbox, keeping your real inbox squeaky clean &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Tracking protection in&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_ag?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AdGuard Ad Blocker&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt; An absolute favorite among privacy advocates. This feature doesn’t just block annoying ads; it strips tracking parameters (like UTM tags) from URLs, masks your search queries, hides your IP address, and stops data brokers and websites from piecing together your digital profile &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Browsing security in&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_ag?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AdGuard Ad Blocker&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt; Finally, the ultimate safety net for those unexpected moments. You click an innocent-looking link, and in a fraction of a second, AdGuard checks the destination against our database. If the site is a malicious clone spoofing a bank or an online shop to steal your credentials, you’ll instantly get a warning screen. Browsing security is the kind of feature you never think about — until it saves you from a scam &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Which of these background heroes is already watching your back, and which one are you excited to try out? Let us know in the comments!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/shwrellia&quot;&gt; /u/shwrellia &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txm5oh/17_years_17_killer_adguard_features_part_three/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txm5oh/17_years_17_killer_adguard_features_part_three/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1txm5oh</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txm5oh/17_years_17_killer_adguard_features_part_three/" /><updated>2026-06-05T14:13:32+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-05T14:13:32+00:00</published><title>17 years, 17 killer AdGuard features: Part three</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/shwrellia</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/shwrellia</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Data nerds might call that a perfect coincidence. We just call it a massive thank you. 17 million users on just one browser is a wild number of people who are officially done with invasive banners, creepy trackers, and endless digital surveillance. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;A milestone this clean is the ultimate excuse to celebrate with some huge anniversary deals: &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;— &lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_ag?utm_source=tg&quot;&gt;Al&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_ag?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;l AdGuard Ad Blocker licenses 45% off&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_ag?utm_source=tg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;— &lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_dns?utm_source=tg&quot;&gt;Pe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_dns?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;rsonal AdGuard DNS subscription 60% off&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_dns?utm_source=tg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;— &lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_vpn?utm_source=tg&quot;&gt;Ad&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_vpn?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;Guard VPN two-year subscription 83% off&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://agrd.io/bday_promo_vpn?utm_source=tg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Th&lt;em&gt;e offer is valid through June 7&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/shwrellia&quot;&gt; /u/shwrellia &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txldf3/17_years_17_000_000_downloads_on_the_chrome_web/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txldf3/17_years_17_000_000_downloads_on_the_chrome_web/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1txldf3</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txldf3/17_years_17_000_000_downloads_on_the_chrome_web/" /><updated>2026-06-05T13:43:30+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-05T13:43:30+00:00</published><title>17 years. 17 000 000 downloads on the Chrome Web Store</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/the_harmonic_heart</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/the_harmonic_heart</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/the_harmonic_heart&quot;&gt; /u/the_harmonic_heart &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/r/firefoxextensions/comments/1u1s2y1/working_adblocker_and_tracker_blocker/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1s38s/working_adblocker_and_tracker_blocker/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u1s38s</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1s38s/working_adblocker_and_tracker_blocker/" /><updated>2026-06-10T04:37:40+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-10T04:37:40+00:00</published><title>Working Ad-Blocker and Tracker Blocker!!!</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Mirali5656</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Mirali5656</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Issue Details&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Feature Request: Add a Server Node in Azerbaijan (Baku)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Current Situation&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I am a loyal AdGuard DNS user from Azerbaijan. AdGuard Support team confirmed that the lack of a server in Azerbaijan is a relevant issue and directed me to submit this feature request.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Current ping results from Azerbaijan to AdGuard DNS (94.140.14.59):&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Metric | Result&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Average ping | ~257ms&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Best ping | ~234ms&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Worst ping | ~286ms&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;For comparison, NextDNS from Azerbaijan averages ~86ms — which is 3x faster.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Problem&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There is currently no AdGuard DNS server located in Azerbaijan. Traffic is being routed through distant servers, adding unnecessary latency for users in this region.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Request&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;✅ Please add a server node in Azerbaijan (Baku)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;With a local server, users in Azerbaijan could potentially achieve pings of 20-30ms, making AdGuard DNS competitive in this region.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Why This Matters&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;- Azerbaijan is located at the crossroads of Eastern Europe and Western Asia&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;- A local server would benefit the entire South Caucasus region (Azerbaijan, Georgia, Armenia)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;- Currently AdGuard DNS is losing users in this region due to high latency&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Supporting Data&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;- AdGuard DNS ping from Azerbaijan: ~257ms ❌&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;- NextDNS ping from Azerbaijan: ~86ms ✅&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;- Expected ping with local server: ~20-30ms 🚀&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Mirali5656&quot;&gt; /u/Mirali5656 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1dauz/add_server_location_in_azerbaijan_baku_to_reduce/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1dauz/add_server_location_in_azerbaijan_baku_to_reduce/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u1dauz</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1dauz/add_server_location_in_azerbaijan_baku_to_reduce/" /><updated>2026-06-09T18:22:22+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-09T18:22:22+00:00</published><title>Add server location in Azerbaijan (Baku) to reduce latency for Caucasus region</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/userX97ee2ska11qa</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/userX97ee2ska11qa</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;As of a few weeks ago AdGuard just doesnt seem to block ads as well as it did in the past. Anyone else noticing this? All filters are up to date and so are the apps/extensions. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/userX97ee2ska11qa&quot;&gt; /u/userX97ee2ska11qa &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1geq1/adguard_mini_for_safari_and_adguard_on_ios_not/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1geq1/adguard_mini_for_safari_and_adguard_on_ios_not/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u1geq1</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1geq1/adguard_mini_for_safari_and_adguard_on_ios_not/" /><updated>2026-06-09T20:13:36+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-09T20:13:36+00:00</published><title>AdGuard Mini for Safari and AdGuard on iOS not blocking ads anymore</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Stevoisiak</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Stevoisiak</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have a JSON object where I want to use &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/AdguardTeam/Scriptlets/blob/master/wiki/about-scriptlets.md#json-prune&quot;&gt;&lt;code&gt;json-prune&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to remove a base-level property &lt;code&gt;ad&lt;/code&gt; if it has a key &lt;code&gt;dataScenario&lt;/code&gt; with the value &lt;code&gt;M365Promo&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Input: &lt;code&gt; { &amp;quot;f&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;raf&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;v&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;1.0&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;rdr&amp;quot;:[ { &amp;quot;c&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;SMC Promotion&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;u&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Surface v1&amp;quot; } ], &amp;quot;ad&amp;quot;:{ &amp;quot;title&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Try Copilot Chat&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;ctaText&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Try Copilot Chat&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;ctaLink&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;https://m365.cloud.microsoft/chat?fromcode=cmmd71pygu7&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;dataScenario&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;M365Promo&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;templateRef&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;UhfBuyButton&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;injectorClass&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;UhfBuyButton&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;campaignId&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;cmmd71pygu7&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;isEmptyControl&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;false&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;overrideContentSelector&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;#c-uhf-nav-cta&amp;quot; } } &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Desired output:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt; { &amp;quot;f&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;raf&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;v&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;1.0&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;rdr&amp;quot;:[ { &amp;quot;c&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;SMC Promotion&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;u&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Surface v1&amp;quot; } ] } &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;(For context, I&amp;#39;m trying to fix an issue where a button on &lt;a href=&quot;https://support.microsoft.com/en-us&quot;&gt;Microsoft&amp;#39;s website&lt;/a&gt; will sometimes &lt;a href=&quot;https://github.com/Stevoisiak/Stevos-AI-Blocklist/issues/76&quot;&gt;change into a Copilot button after page load&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The documentation for json-prune has an example for removing properties from an object with &lt;code&gt;{-}&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;[=]&lt;/code&gt;. However, it is based on a scenario where second-level properties with varying names are removed. (&lt;code&gt;example.org#%#//scriptlet(&amp;#39;json-prune&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;videos.{-}.isAd.[=].true&amp;#39;)&lt;/code&gt;)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I can &lt;em&gt;somewhat&lt;/em&gt; get the behavior I want by replacing my base attribute name with a wildcard &lt;code&gt;{-}&lt;/code&gt;. However, I&amp;#39;d rather be able to specify &lt;code&gt;ad&lt;/code&gt; as the specific attribute name.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt; support.microsoft.com#%#//scriptlet(&amp;#39;json-prune&amp;#39;, &amp;#39;{-}.dataScenario.[=].M365Promo&amp;#39;) &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;How can I remove the entire &lt;code&gt;ad&lt;/code&gt; attribute from JSON if it contains a key &lt;code&gt;dataScenario&lt;/code&gt; with value &lt;code&gt;M365Promo&lt;/code&gt;?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Stevoisiak&quot;&gt; /u/Stevoisiak &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1hzff/how_do_i_remove_a_named_property_from_a_json/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1hzff/how_do_i_remove_a_named_property_from_a_json/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u1hzff</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1hzff/how_do_i_remove_a_named_property_from_a_json/" /><updated>2026-06-09T21:10:48+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-09T21:10:48+00:00</published><title>How do I remove a named property from a JSON object with json-prune if it has a specific key?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Hungry-Criticism-770</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Hungry-Criticism-770</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;The AdguardHome Tiktok blocking is not working on iphones specifically. Is there something additional that can be done?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Hungry-Criticism-770&quot;&gt; /u/Hungry-Criticism-770 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1367k/tiktok_not_blocked/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1367k/tiktok_not_blocked/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u1367k</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u1367k/tiktok_not_blocked/" /><updated>2026-06-09T12:10:30+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-09T12:10:30+00:00</published><title>Tiktok Not Blocked</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/WestAd2973</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/WestAd2973</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;as the name suggests i need help to use tailscale dns with adguard without breaking if i have to restart the server&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/WestAd2973&quot;&gt; /u/WestAd2973 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u12z73/how_to_use_adguard_home_with_tailscale/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u12z73/how_to_use_adguard_home_with_tailscale/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u12z73</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u12z73/how_to_use_adguard_home_with_tailscale/" /><updated>2026-06-09T12:01:36+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-09T12:01:36+00:00</published><title>how to use adguard home with tailscale ?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Odd-Increase3255</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Odd-Increase3255</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I started out using Adguard Home on my local network. No fancy configuration - out of the box it did a very good job at cutting down on ad heavy sites. Now I do understand the limitations of a DNS approach, but I prefer it over a local per-device solution for a variety of reasons.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Long story short, some hardware failures and new networking equipment caused me to take my homelab servers off line. Someday I&amp;#39;ll get back to set everything up again. In the meantime I went ahead and bought a subscription to Adguard DNS thinking it would be pretty much the same thing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But the issue is it really doesn&amp;#39;t seem to do much at all. &lt;a href=&quot;https://adblock.turtlecute.org/&quot;&gt;Turtlecute&lt;/a&gt; shows only about 8% being blocked. The Adguard DNS dashboard shows millions of requests but only about a 3% block rate. Sites like USAToday have zero ads blocked when I know it was working well under Home.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I was hoping someone can sanity check me here and maybe point out something simple I&amp;#39;m missing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Relevant hardware info:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Adguard DNS is set up at the router level through plain DNS (non encrypted)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Router is a Ubiquiti UDR7&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Most clients on the network are a mixture of Apple devices with a few Win 11 devices&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Things I&amp;#39;ve checked:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://adguard.com/en/test.html&quot;&gt;Adguard test page&lt;/a&gt; shows that DNS is connected and working.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;No other DNS servers are configured at the router or client level. A quick &lt;code&gt;scutil --dns | grep &amp;#39;nameserver\[[0-9]*\]&amp;#39;&lt;/code&gt; on one of the clients reveals only the Adguard supplied ip&amp;#39;s&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;IPV6 is enabled in my network but I&amp;#39;ve made sure to add the corresponding DNS ip&amp;#39;s so there shouldn&amp;#39;t be any leakage there&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;I&amp;#39;ve tested disabling Private Relay on apple devices, doesn&amp;#39;t seem to make any difference.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Doesn&amp;#39;t seem to be browser specific&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m currently out of ideas and have resorted to having to use uBlock Origin Lite where I can. One reason I wanted to try to figure this out is because some day when I eventually get Home running again, I figured I would keep the current (paid) DNS setup and provide the ip&amp;#39;s as backups in case of a local failure.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Odd-Increase3255&quot;&gt; /u/Odd-Increase3255 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u0vji8/help_troubleshooting_why_adguard_dns_isnt/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u0vji8/help_troubleshooting_why_adguard_dns_isnt/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u0vji8</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u0vji8/help_troubleshooting_why_adguard_dns_isnt/" /><updated>2026-06-09T05:05:01+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-09T05:05:01+00:00</published><title>Help troubleshooting why Adguard DNS isn't blocking many ads</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/JennyThallia</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/JennyThallia</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;How can adguard compute the amount of data saved in gigabytes etc if it doesn&amp;#39;t download the file? &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/JennyThallia&quot;&gt; /u/JennyThallia &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u044nu/how_are_the_numbers_in_data_saved_arrived_at/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u044nu/how_are_the_numbers_in_data_saved_arrived_at/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u044nu</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u044nu/how_are_the_numbers_in_data_saved_arrived_at/" /><updated>2026-06-08T10:35:30+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-08T10:35:30+00:00</published><title>How are the numbers in Data Saved arrived at?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Vegeta_vs_Goku</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Vegeta_vs_Goku</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am planning to get an iPhone and just use AdGuard DNS (94.140.14.14 / 94.140.15.15) instead of the app. Does it actually block ads in apps/games or mostly just trackers?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Any help much appreciated. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Vegeta_vs_Goku&quot;&gt; /u/Vegeta_vs_Goku &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u03r7r/does_adguard_dns_actually_block_ads_in_ios_apps/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u03r7r/does_adguard_dns_actually_block_ads_in_ios_apps/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1u03r7r</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1u03r7r/does_adguard_dns_actually_block_ads_in_ios_apps/" /><updated>2026-06-08T10:15:12+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-08T10:15:12+00:00</published><title>Does AdGuard DNS actually block ads in iOS apps?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Soft_Procedure5050</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Soft_Procedure5050</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;What VPN do you guys recommend pairing with AdGuard? I have a few months left on my NordVPN subscription, but since picking up AdGuard a few days ago, I have been running into issues getting NordVPN to work alongside it on macOS. So I am looking for something that plays seamlessly with AdGuard. Proton VPN, PIA, Surfshark, what has worked for you?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Update: Fixed it by turning off NordVPN&amp;#39;s DNS filtering completely. Keep AdGuard&amp;#39;s filtering mode on Network Extension rather than Automatic Proxy. That solved my issue, though if it breaks for you, change AdGuard&amp;#39;s filtering mode to Automatic Proxy instead.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Soft_Procedure5050&quot;&gt; /u/Soft_Procedure5050 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzuyoc/what_macos_vpn_works_seamlessly_with_adguard/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzuyoc/what_macos_vpn_works_seamlessly_with_adguard/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1tzuyoc</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzuyoc/what_macos_vpn_works_seamlessly_with_adguard/" /><updated>2026-06-08T02:13:03+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-08T02:13:03+00:00</published><title>What macOS VPN works seamlessly with AdGuard?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/mistaken_idea737</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/mistaken_idea737</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/mistaken_idea737&quot;&gt; /u/mistaken_idea737 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/r/u_mistaken_idea737/comments/1tzyfcb/ad_free/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzyht6/ad_free/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1tzyht6</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzyht6/ad_free/" /><updated>2026-06-08T05:12:01+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-08T05:12:01+00:00</published><title>AD FREE</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/peppolone12</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/peppolone12</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Environment&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;macOS:&lt;/strong&gt; 15.7.8 (24G806) — Sequoia&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;AdGuard:&lt;/strong&gt; reproduced on v2.18.0.2089 (release) and v2.19.0.2234 (beta)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Filtering mode:&lt;/strong&gt; Network Extension (System Extension)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ul&gt; &lt;h1&gt;Bug #1 — AdGuard protection automatically disabled every morning after sleep&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What happens:&lt;/strong&gt; Every morning I open the MacBook from sleep and find the main AdGuard filtering toggle OFF in the menu bar app. Reproduces every night without exception across both versions, for several weeks.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Exact sequence from&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;code&gt;Adguard-group.log&lt;/code&gt; &lt;strong&gt;(June 6 — identical every day):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;06:29:41 (Filters) agflm_standard.db: Begin differential update 06:29:41 [NE] AdguardCore DnsChange: DNS servers changed: (null) ↑ DarkWake, network offline 06:29:41 ERROR (FiltersService: didUpdateFilters(_:)): AGOuterError: &amp;quot;HttpClientNetworkError: error sending request for url https://filters.adtidy.org/mac_v3/filters.js&amp;quot; 06:29:41 (DnsChangingMonitor) Change DNS fired with: [] — 28 minutes of silence — 06:58:02 (DnsChangingMonitor) Change DNS fired with: [&amp;quot;1.1.1.1&amp;quot;, ...] ↑ Full wake, network restored 06:59:01 (AAService) Setting protection enabled to &amp;quot;NO&amp;quot; ← THE BUG 06:59:01 (AAService) filteringModuleTouch disabling filtration. 06:59:02 [NE] VPN service emergency stop: XPC connection interrupted 06:59:02 (CoreLibServiceHandler) Service stopped. &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;Setting protection enabled to &amp;quot;NO&amp;quot;&lt;/code&gt; fires &lt;strong&gt;30 minutes after&lt;/strong&gt; the &lt;code&gt;HttpClientNetworkError&lt;/code&gt;, triggered at full wake — not at error time. This is a deferred state reconciliation bug in &lt;code&gt;AAService&lt;/code&gt;: when the system reconnects after a failed filter update cycle, &lt;code&gt;filteringModuleTouch&lt;/code&gt; incorrectly disables filtration instead of restoring it.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Additional finding:&lt;/strong&gt; this also happens during active use, not only after sleep. On June 6 at 18:24 the toggle turned off by itself 24 seconds after closing the Preferences window — the Mac was fully awake. Same &lt;code&gt;AAService&lt;/code&gt; → &lt;code&gt;filteringModuleTouch&lt;/code&gt; sequence in the logs, triggered this time by a &lt;code&gt;reconfigFiltering&lt;/code&gt; loop in the Network Extension followed by an XPC connection drop. Two different triggers, same broken code path.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tried:&lt;/strong&gt; v2.19 beta, disabled PowerNap on AC, disabled &lt;code&gt;activateFiltersAutomaticEnabled&lt;/code&gt; — all no effect.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h1&gt;Bug #2 — ~2 GB/day excessive disk writes: root cause identified in SQLite configuration&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;p&gt;macOS flagged AdGuard in &lt;code&gt;/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/&lt;/code&gt; for exceeding the disk write budget on &lt;strong&gt;both versions&lt;/strong&gt;:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;Adguard_2026-06-06.diag (v2.19 beta, main app): Event: disk writes Writes: 2147.48 MB over 85252s (25.19 KB/s avg, limit 24.86 KB/s) com.adguard.mac.adguard.network-extension_2026-06-02.diag (v2.18, NE): Event: disk writes Writes: 2147.49 MB over 82942s (25.89 KB/s avg, limit 24.86 KB/s) &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt; &lt;h1&gt;What the SQLite database reveals&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;p&gt;I opened &lt;code&gt;agflm_standard.db&lt;/code&gt; directly. Key findings:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;code&gt;rules_text&lt;/code&gt; &lt;strong&gt;is stored as inline TEXT in the database, not as flat files.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Every filter rule is stored as a giant TEXT blob inside &lt;code&gt;rules_list.rules_text&lt;/code&gt;. Current sizes:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;filter_id name rules rules_text size 2 AdGuard Base filter 139,350 6.52 MB 3 AdGuard Tracking Protection 194,575 6.10 MB 101 EasyList 90,923 2.31 MB (disabled!) 118 EasyPrivacy 55,394 1.42 MB ... (+ 68 more filters) ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── TOTAL ACTIVE rules_text: ~18.3 MB inline in DB TOTAL ALL rules_text (incl. disabled): 46.66 MB inline in DB &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;code&gt;journal_mode = DELETE&lt;/code&gt; &lt;strong&gt;(not WAL) on&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;code&gt;agflm_standard.db&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;PRAGMA journal_mode; → delete PRAGMA synchronous; → 2 (FULL) PRAGMA page_size; → 4096 PRAGMA auto_vacuum; → 0 &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;journal_mode=DELETE&lt;/code&gt; with &lt;code&gt;synchronous=FULL&lt;/code&gt; means every transaction:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ol&gt; &lt;li&gt;Writes a full rollback journal to disk (fsync)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Modifies the data pages (fsync)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Deletes the journal (fsync)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ol&gt; &lt;p&gt;This is the worst-case I/O pattern for frequent large updates. With 18.3 MB of active &lt;code&gt;rules_text&lt;/code&gt;, each full update causes &lt;strong&gt;at minimum 36.6 MB of actual disk I/O&lt;/strong&gt; (data + rollback journal), confirmed by the simultaneous presence of &lt;code&gt;pagerWalFrames&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;pagerAddPageToRollbackJournal&lt;/code&gt; in the same stack trace — which is contradictory and indicates the DB is switching journal modes mid-operation or misconfigured.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;code&gt;sfbr.db&lt;/code&gt; (SafeBrowsing) correctly uses &lt;code&gt;journal_mode=WAL&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;synchronous=NORMAL&lt;/code&gt; — the right configuration. The problem is isolated to &lt;code&gt;agflm_standard.db&lt;/code&gt; and &lt;code&gt;adguard.db&lt;/code&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3. 21 filters update every 60 minutes. That&amp;#39;s 24 times per day.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;SELECT interval_min, COUNT(*) FROM diff_updates GROUP BY interval_min: 60 min → 21 filters (filter_ids: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,224) 240 min → 61 filters &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt; &lt;p&gt;The 21 most important filters — including AdGuard Base (139k rules, 6.5 MB) and AdGuard Tracking Protection (194k rules, 6.1 MB) — refresh every &lt;strong&gt;60 minutes&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4. 72 disabled filters still have their full&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;code&gt;rules_text&lt;/code&gt; &lt;strong&gt;in the DB (28.35 MB wasted).&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;255 Phishing URL Blocklist 51,068 rules 3.45 MB ← disabled, still in DB 122 Fanboy&amp;#39;s Annoyances 55,855 rules 2.48 MB ← disabled 101 EasyList 90,923 rules 2.31 MB ← disabled 201 Web Annoyances Ultralist 16,855 rules 1.58 MB ← disabled ... (68 total disabled filters, 28.35 MB total) &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt; &lt;p&gt;Disabled filters are never cleaned from &lt;code&gt;rules_list&lt;/code&gt;. This means the DB is always carrying ~28 MB of dead weight, which participates in every journal write during vacuum and page operations.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h1&gt;The math&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;21 filters × 24 updates/day × ~36.6 MB I/O per update = ~878 MB/day (conservative) + SafeBrowsing DB (sfbr.db, WAL mode but 160 samples stuck on pwrite in NE crash report) + adguard.db (also journal_mode=DELETE) ≈ 2+ GB/day total disk writes &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt; &lt;p&gt;This matches exactly what macOS reported.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h1&gt;The link between Bug #1 and Bug #2&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;p&gt;During DarkWake, &lt;code&gt;AdGuardFLM&lt;/code&gt; starts a full update cycle on &lt;code&gt;agflm_standard.db&lt;/code&gt; — writing the rollback journal, beginning to rewrite the &lt;code&gt;rules_text&lt;/code&gt; blobs. The network drops mid-transaction (&lt;code&gt;HttpClientNetworkError&lt;/code&gt;). SQLite rolls back via the journal, but the transaction leaves the DB in an inconsistent state (dirty pages, partial WAL). When the system wakes up 28 minutes later and &lt;code&gt;AAService&lt;/code&gt; attempts to reconcile the filter state after the failed transaction, it calls &lt;code&gt;filteringModuleTouch&lt;/code&gt; → filtering disabled.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary of concrete issues found:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ol&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;agflm_standard.db&lt;/code&gt; uses &lt;code&gt;journal_mode=DELETE, synchronous=FULL&lt;/code&gt; — should be &lt;code&gt;WAL, NORMAL&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;rules_text&lt;/code&gt; stored as inline TEXT blobs instead of flat files — causes full-DB rewrites on each update&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;72 disabled filters retain full &lt;code&gt;rules_text&lt;/code&gt; (28.35 MB) — never cleaned&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;21 critical filters update every 60 min → 24 full rewrites/day on a DELETE-journal DB&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;&lt;code&gt;AAService&lt;/code&gt; does not recover gracefully from a mid-transaction network failure — disables filtering instead of retrying&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;Same &lt;code&gt;AAService&lt;/code&gt; bug also triggers during active use after closing Preferences (separate XPC trigger)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;/ol&gt; &lt;p&gt;Full &lt;code&gt;.diag&lt;/code&gt; files and DB schema available on request.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UPDATE&lt;/strong&gt;: I manually switched all three AdGuard databases to WAL mode while AdGuard was closed:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;bash sqlite3 agflm_standard.db &amp;quot;PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL; PRAGMA synchronous=NORMAL;&amp;quot; sqlite3 adguard.db &amp;quot;PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL; PRAGMA synchronous=NORMAL;&amp;quot; sqlite3 agflm_dns.db &amp;quot;PRAGMA journal_mode=WAL; PRAGMA synchronous=NORMAL;&amp;quot; &lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Results after a full day: - AdGuard respected the new settings after restart — &lt;code&gt;journal_mode&lt;/code&gt; stayed WAL through multiple filter update cycles - &lt;code&gt;PRAGMA wal_checkpoint&lt;/code&gt; consistently returns &lt;code&gt;0|0|0&lt;/code&gt; (clean state) — WAL is committing correctly - &lt;strong&gt;No new &lt;code&gt;.diag&lt;/code&gt; files generated today&lt;/strong&gt; — macOS has not flagged AdGuard for excessive disk writes since the change - The WAL file stays at 0 bytes between update cycles, meaning SQLite is checkpointing efficiently after each write&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This confirms the excessive disk writes were caused entirely by &lt;code&gt;journal_mode=DELETE + synchronous=FULL&lt;/code&gt;. Switching to WAL eliminated the issue on this machine. The fix is trivially simple on AdGuard&amp;#39;s side — &lt;code&gt;sfbr.db&lt;/code&gt; already uses WAL correctly, so the infrastructure is there.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/peppolone12&quot;&gt; /u/peppolone12 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tz9jf0/adguard_mac_bug_system_protection_disabled_every/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tz9jf0/adguard_mac_bug_system_protection_disabled_every/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1tz9jf0</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tz9jf0/adguard_mac_bug_system_protection_disabled_every/" /><updated>2026-06-07T11:23:17+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-07T11:23:17+00:00</published><title>Adguard Mac -[BUG] System protection disabled every morning after sleep + excessive disk writes — two separate issues, deep analysis, both v2.18 and v2.19 beta</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/HitMachineHOTS</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/HitMachineHOTS</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t want to whitelist instagram otherwise what&amp;#39;s the point of having vpn...&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/HitMachineHOTS&quot;&gt; /u/HitMachineHOTS &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzg88f/instagram_videos_stop_after_few_seconds/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzg88f/instagram_videos_stop_after_few_seconds/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1tzg88f</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzg88f/instagram_videos_stop_after_few_seconds/" /><updated>2026-06-07T16:09:48+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-07T16:09:48+00:00</published><title>Instagram videos stop after few seconds</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Sea_Mission_7643</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Sea_Mission_7643</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Sea_Mission_7643&quot;&gt; /u/Sea_Mission_7643 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/r/homelab/comments/1tyyjx0/adguard_home_server_on_macos/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzffz0/adguard_home_server_on_macos/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1tzffz0</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tzffz0/adguard_home_server_on_macos/" /><updated>2026-06-07T15:39:40+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-07T15:39:40+00:00</published><title>Adguard home server on MacOS?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Home4Salez</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Home4Salez</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Android adguard&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Home4Salez&quot;&gt; /u/Home4Salez &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tz3v28/any_extensions_that_are_worth_a_while/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tz3v28/any_extensions_that_are_worth_a_while/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1tz3v28</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1tz3v28/any_extensions_that_are_worth_a_while/" /><updated>2026-06-07T05:54:53+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-07T05:54:53+00:00</published><title>Any extensions that are worth a while?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Soft_Procedure5050</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Soft_Procedure5050</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Should I get AdGuard for macOS via sideload or from the App Store, and why? I use Chrome on macOS. Thanks in advance.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Soft_Procedure5050&quot;&gt; /u/Soft_Procedure5050 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty90aj/adguard_on_macos_sideload_or_app_store_for_chrome/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty90aj/adguard_on_macos_sideload_or_app_store_for_chrome/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1ty90aj</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty90aj/adguard_on_macos_sideload_or_app_store_for_chrome/" /><updated>2026-06-06T05:58:09+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-06T05:58:09+00:00</published><title>AdGuard on macOS: Sideload or App Store for Chrome users?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Acrobatic-Monitor516</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Acrobatic-Monitor516</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#39;t figure out how to use both in concomitance. whenever i enabled the vpn (which is also very slow), adblocking stops working altogether&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Acrobatic-Monitor516&quot;&gt; /u/Acrobatic-Monitor516 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty1gig/enabling_adguard_vpn_disables_the_adblocker/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty1gig/enabling_adguard_vpn_disables_the_adblocker/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1ty1gig</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty1gig/enabling_adguard_vpn_disables_the_adblocker/" /><updated>2026-06-05T23:48:51+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-05T23:48:51+00:00</published><title>enabling adguard vpn disables the adblocker</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Acrobatic-Monitor516</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Acrobatic-Monitor516</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;wondering what differences there are between the two protocols, outside of privacy, is one faster/more efficient than another, what about battery if any?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Acrobatic-Monitor516&quot;&gt; /u/Acrobatic-Monitor516 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty1frk/ios_dns_vs_url_filters_any_practical_differences/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty1frk/ios_dns_vs_url_filters_any_practical_differences/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1ty1frk</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1ty1frk/ios_dns_vs_url_filters_any_practical_differences/" /><updated>2026-06-05T23:47:55+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-05T23:47:55+00:00</published><title>ios: dns vs url filters, any practical differences outside of privacy?</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/mrrak25</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/mrrak25</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;EDIT: As soon as I decided to make the post, the repository came back 👍&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.trustpilot.com/evaluate/openl.io&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ontem, o repositório do Hagezi no GitHub foi desativado. Ele disse que já está trabalhando em uma correção, mas por enquanto usará um espelho em:&lt;a href=&quot;https://gitlab.com/hagezi/mirror&quot;&gt;https://gitlab.com/hagezi/mirror&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Portanto, se alguém estiver enfrentando problemas ou notar uma piora nos bloqueios, é por isso. E se o AdGuard quiser atualizar a lista de bloqueio até que tudo seja resolvido, todos ficarão gratos.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/mrrak25&quot;&gt; /u/mrrak25 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txj5sz/about_hagezis_list/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txj5sz/about_hagezis_list/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1txj5sz</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txj5sz/about_hagezis_list/" /><updated>2026-06-05T12:11:52+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-05T12:11:52+00:00</published><title>About HaGeZi's list</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/shwrellia</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/shwrellia</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;We’re keeping our birthday countdown going! While the first four features were all about managing traffic,&lt;a href=&quot;https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-team-top-17-features.html?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt; today’s lineup is all about bringing flawless order right to your screen.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;The allowlist in AdGuard Ad Blocker&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt; Kicking off today’s list is a feature our Extension Team Lead calls simple yet incredibly impactful. The Allowlist solves a dilemma we’ve all faced: you love a specific website, you want to support the creators by letting their ads run, but turning off your protection entirely feels like walking into a rainstorm without an umbrella. With the Allowlist, you just add that specific site to your exceptions. One click, and filtering is paused for them while the rest of the web stays completely protected &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Custom filtering rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt; For those who want to build their own bespoke defense system, our second feature is a game-changer. Our CTO describes it philosophically: &amp;quot;Writing custom rules is complex, but it gives you ultimate flexibility.&amp;quot; Essentially, you take complete control of your content. You write the rules that dictate exactly which elements are allowed to load and which ones get intercepted before they even hit your screen. This is the ultimate tool for power users who want to fine-tune their web experience down to the millimeter &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;The element blocker&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt; If writing hardcore scripts isn&amp;#39;t your vibe, but you still want to vaporize that annoying pop-up or clunky sidebar widget, enter our third hero. The Element Blocker is an absolute fan-favorite across tech forums. You just click &amp;quot;Block element,&amp;quot; select the eyesore on your screen, and boom — it&amp;#39;s gone. Design minimalists call this their absolute favorite tool, and we get it: it makes webpages look as clean as a premium magazine cover, all without writing a single line of code. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Userscripts&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt; For the true geeks out there who feel like out-of-the-box browser capabilities are never quite enough, our fourth feature is for you. AdGuard on Android, iOS, and desktop doubles as a fully-fledged userscript manager. This means you can use your ad blocker to inject custom functionality into websites, add new buttons, overhaul clumsy user interfaces, and feel like a bit of a web wizard. This topic regularly blows up in Reddit threads, and for good reason &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Take control of the web on your own terms while our birthday deals are still live!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/shwrellia&quot;&gt; /u/shwrellia &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txhjgy/17_years_17_killer_adguard_features_part_two/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txhjgy/17_years_17_killer_adguard_features_part_two/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1txhjgy</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txhjgy/17_years_17_killer_adguard_features_part_two/" /><updated>2026-06-05T10:54:54+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-05T10:54:54+00:00</published><title>17 years, 17 killer AdGuard features: Part two</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/OvenPsychological592</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/OvenPsychological592</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Je lisais des scans sur des sites plus ou moins légaux, envahis de pubs, de pop-ups et surtout de liens hypertextes. J’ai ensuite commencé à utiliser dns.adguard.com, qui fonctionnait bien et me permettait de me débarrasser des pubs, des pop-ups et des liens hypertextes. Mais récemment, ce lien ne fonctionnait plus. On m’a renseigné, et j’ai trouvé un nouveau lien, dns.adguard-dns.com. Ce nouveau lien fonctionne bien pour bloquer les pop-ups et les pubs à outrance, mais il ne me débarrasse plus des liens hypertextes, surtout sur le site Scan Manga. Je voudrais donc savoir s’il existe un autre moyen, ou un autre DNS, qui me permettrait de régler ce problème.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;merci d’avance &lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/OvenPsychological592&quot;&gt; /u/OvenPsychological592 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txy74t/dns/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txy74t/dns/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1txy74t</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1txy74t/dns/" /><updated>2026-06-05T21:33:51+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-05T21:33:51+00:00</published><title>dns</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/shwrellia</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/shwrellia</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;We don’t usually shout from the rooftops about point releases, but &lt;a href=&quot;https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-mail-v1-5.html?utm_source=reddit&quot;&gt;v1.5 is packed with too many quality-of-life tweaks to stay quiet&lt;/a&gt;. From updated visuals to simpler interactions and smarter updates, this release is focused on making the app look and feel better in everyday use. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Here is what you’ll notice right after you update: &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;A cleaner, accident-proof UI&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt; We’ve refreshed the color palette and completely overhauled the navigation. Say goodbye to swipe gestures that made you accidentally trash emails — everything is now mapped to clear, visible action buttons &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Temp mail takes center stage&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt; We’re gradually shifting more focus toward temporary email addresses, and the app’s main screen now reflects that. Don&amp;#39;t worry, your trusty email aliases didn&amp;#39;t go anywhere — they just took a backseat &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Seamless in-app updates&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br/&gt; No more jumping through hoops to stay current. The second a new build drops, AdGuard Mail will ping you. One tap, and you’re running the latest version &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;We want to hear from you! We’re actively gathering feedback to keep making the app better. Update today, test-drive the new layout, and let us know your thoughts &lt;a href=&quot;https://surveys.adguard.com/en/adguard_mail/form.html%20&quot;&gt;through our feedback form&lt;/a&gt; — and yes, we really do read every single message.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/shwrellia&quot;&gt; /u/shwrellia &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1twrbyj/adguard_mail_v15_fresh_looks_zero_friction/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1twrbyj/adguard_mail_v15_fresh_looks_zero_friction/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1twrbyj</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1twrbyj/adguard_mail_v15_fresh_looks_zero_friction/" /><updated>2026-06-04T15:40:11+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-04T15:40:11+00:00</published><title>AdGuard Mail v1.5: Fresh looks, zero friction</title></entry><entry><author><name>/u/Own_Diver_9162</name><uri>https://old.reddit.com/user/Own_Diver_9162</uri></author><category term="Adguard" label="r/Adguard"/><content type="html">&lt;!-- SC_OFF --&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been using AdGuard DNS for a while now and I&amp;#39;m really happy with it overall. I do have a few suggestions that I think could make the service even better, and I&amp;#39;d love to hear if others feel the same way.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. CNAME flattening support&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;It would be great if AdGuard DNS could support CNAME flattening. This would help resolve CNAME chains directly to A/AAAA records, which can improve resolution speed and reduce the number of round-trips, especially for domains that use long CNAME chains.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2. Custom TTL min/max override&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Right now it seems like TTL override is only available for blocked domains. I&amp;#39;d really like the ability to set a global minimum and maximum TTL for &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; responses, not just blocked ones. Being able to clamp TTL values (both floor and ceiling) would give a lot more control over caching behavior and help balance freshness against performance.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3. Improved Anycast routing accuracy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This is the big one for me. I&amp;#39;m located in Los Angeles, but my queries consistently get routed to a node in Miami instead of a nearby West Coast server. This adds noticeable latency that shouldn&amp;#39;t be there given how many closer nodes should be available.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Is anyone else experiencing this kind of suboptimal Anycast routing? I&amp;#39;m curious whether it&amp;#39;s a widespread issue or something specific to my region/ISP. Either way, better Anycast accuracy would make a real difference in performance.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- SC_ON --&gt; &amp;#32; submitted by &amp;#32; &lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/user/Own_Diver_9162&quot;&gt; /u/Own_Diver_9162 &lt;/a&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1twqysm/a_few_feature_suggestions_for_adguard_dns/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#32; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1twqysm/a_few_feature_suggestions_for_adguard_dns/&quot;&gt;[comments]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><id>t3_1twqysm</id><link href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Adguard/comments/1twqysm/a_few_feature_suggestions_for_adguard_dns/" /><updated>2026-06-04T15:27:33+00:00</updated><published>2026-06-04T15:27:33+00:00</published><title>A few feature suggestions for AdGuard DNS</title></entry></feed>